The interns, Pastor Russ, and Dr. j |
Instead of writing down a brief schedule and description of the entire trip, I thought I would share with you what I've been processing since then and the parts of the trip that contributed. Before the trip started I had just started thinking about the differences in theology and how people can come to different philosophical conclusions based on the context of study. For example, a person who is studying theology in a library without contact with anyone will come to different conclusions than a person who has no access to books and is only working in certain ministries. I know these are extremes, but it is interesting to see how action affects thinking.
In line with my thoughts on this before the trip our host for most of the trip was a professor at Moody Graduate School- Dr. Julius Wong Loi Sing. I cannot describe to you how helpful and entertaining it was to have him a part of the group. He was in and out of our activities because he had other meetings and classes, but when he was with us his sense of humor and his knowledge kept us on our toes. In a small way he was an interesting peg on the spectrum mentioned earlier. He was a professor for the graduate school yet he was our connection to all of these on-the-ground ministries and he knew all about them. He also gave some interesting insight to the direction that Moody Bible Institute has been taking recently in terms of the academic and the practical.
Meeting Dr. J was our first stop which took us to Moody. We had a little time to walk around and see the D.L. Moody museum that the school has. This added more food for my thoughts. Moody was known for being a little more on the charismatic side, a little more on the Armenianist side, and relatively uneducated. But his school, now some 125+ years later now leans more fundamentalist and Calvinist as it has further become a celebrated educational institute. Is this due to a theological trend or swing? Or could it be that when the focus turns to theological education more than evangelism or practical theology we see these changes?
Let me be clear, I'm not saying that D.L. Moody would be disappointed with where we are now. He might have known that this would happen and actually wanted this for future ministers. Or maybe he just wanted sound biblical training, uncaring of theological bias, and this is what history has brought us too. Honestly, I have not done in-depth study of Moody or the school, but this is what I have picked up from fellow students who have done more research than I.
After seeing Moody a bit (something I have done before) and meeting Dr. J, we began to have busy days running around Chicago visiting different kinds of ministries and meeting different people. The thing that everyone that we met with had in common was passion for the work of God to be done in their context. We met Sarah who works for an after school program in Cabrini Green called By the Hand. She is a single woman originally from Kentucky who sought to work in one of the more difficult places in Chicago. She gave her life to this ministry, so much so that she adopted a couple of young boys who had a more extreme family situation.
We visited another after school program that was in Cabrini Green, but since the gentrification of the area, they moved to south Chicago to help out that area. The after school program helps kids in the poor Chicago Public School system aspire to do better than their environment often equips them for. When we were there the program was celebrating that one of its eighth graders recently tested well enough to go to a sponsored school- which is much better than continuing on in the public schools. It was a really rewarding experience because we got to hang out and help some of the kids in the program. These were some of the wittiest, funniest kids that I have ever met. I didn't realize how my west coast inspired style would not translate to south Chicago. I had a lot of the kids gawk and ask me about my plugs, long hair, and tattoo... which they would then continue to laugh at. But it was cool how that was an easy ice breaker which allowed us to enjoy helping the kids do their homework, read, have a brief bible lesson, and then, of course, play some dodgeball.
Briefly, for those who are unfamiliar with gentrification what I learned from the trip is that it is the reversal of the "white flight". In history there was the movement of affluent people out of the downtown city areas to the suburbs to escape some of the downtown culture that was being created by the pull of industry. But recently culture has turned its eye back on cities as they are becoming less of a focus of huge manufacturing plants and other factories and more of focus for rising businesses. Gentrification is the term of the affluent coming back to the cities, relocating government issued housing, and spending a ton of money in making those once run down areas into trendy, urban places friendly for tourists and upper middle aged business people. If I seem to be presenting this in a positive or negative light, I do not mean too. I am, rightfully or wrongfully, taking the perspective of unbiased, objective history. It has both positive and negative effects on different groups of people. Until one becomes intimate with the context and issue, it is hard to know what the right and best course of action is.
One of the other more unique experiences that we had was we witnessed a very different discipleship group. This was probably one of the most directly intellectually stimulating times of the trip. We were with very intelligent people who were very aware of culture and Christianity. They had taken "life together" to the next level. From what I gathered they at least met once a week to share a meal and catch up in their group which was around 8-10ish people (which they considered was getting "too big"), but they also made it a point to get involved in each others lives out side of the group and talked about meeting regularly outside in one on one or smaller group situations. They would do everything from just getting coffee to talk or going to see a movie. They were intentional about speaking into what was occurring in each others lives whether it was big things like general life direction or smaller situations that happened at work, school, or in their families.
What was unclear about this group was whether or not they considered themselves a church and I believe this is where the tension for some in our group lied. This is where all my study of eccliesology would come into play. Encountering this group led to questions such as; "what is necessary for a church?", "what is the church?", "what is required from the church?". Some of them did also attend a gathering of believers on Sunday, some did not. When I asked the organizer of this discipleship program (that is occurring in different areas of the U.S. as well as a group overseas I believe) about the history and development of this... thing for lack of a better word he gave a brief personal history of his work as a senior pastor of a couple churches. When trying to bring a similar discipleship program into the church it was evidently like oil and water, it ended up making a group that were in the discipleship primarily and a group primarily going to church. I regret not having more time to talk with him more and find out why he thinks that was the situation, but it is a talk for the future.
This brings a lot of pertinent questions in Christianity today. People are becoming nervous of things like the New Perspective on Paul and the influence it has on theological and church movements such as the emerging and emergent church. I believe we need to realize that we have a great debt to our history but we also have a great responsibility to our future and we need to bring those two together when discussing the appropriateness in our action as Christians. What is necessary for a church? How far should we stretch people in certain spiritual disciplines? How important are certain forms of worship over others? How much of preference (theological and practical) plays into our distinctions? Can we maintain minor distinctions and also our unity as the Universal Church? People have struggled and are struggling with these questions. Do not feel overwhelmed. Pray and humbly seek God's word and wise counsel because if history has anything to say we probably won't get it perfect in our generation either.
On Sunday we went to six or seven different churches. We visited four "high" churches (Roman Catholic, Episcopalian, Pentecostal, and Greek Orthodox) and some "low" churches that were in various areas of Chicago. Being in different buildings and witnessing the various different forms of worship was an awesome experience. If you have not done something like that where you live, I strongly suggest that you do so.
Overall the trip was extremely useful. I engaged in thoughts that I will continue to wrestle with for my foreseeable future and also got to meet a ton of passionate people filling a need that God has burdened on their heart. I just would like to thank those that gave me support for going on this trip and the professors that gave understanding for the missed classes. I hope this gave you some things to think about. Please feel free to contact me or leave a comment to talk more about the things discussed here. I am very much a fan of learning as a conversation.
To those who read this all and are praying for me and others mentioned in this post, God bless.
0 Responses to 'Internship Trip to Chicago'
Post a Comment